2000 Audi RS4 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 Audi RS4 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 540 kg more than 2000 Audi RS4.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi RS4 has manual transmission. 2000 Audi RS4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi RS4 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | RS4 | 62 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 376 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 79 L |