2000 Audi RS4 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62

To start off, 2000 Audi RS4 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 530 kg more than 2000 Audi RS4.

Because 2000 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi RS4. (449 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi RS4.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Audi RS4 1961 Cadillac 62
Make Audi Cadillac
Model RS4 62
Year Released 2000 1961
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2669 cc 6388 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 376 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 449 Nm 582 Nm
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 98.4 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1585 kg 2115 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 5650 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 3300 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 79 L