2000 Audi RS4 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Audi RS4 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi RS4 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2000 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi RS4 has manual transmission. 2000 Audi RS4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi RS4 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | RS4 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 376 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2760 mm |