2000 Audi RS4 vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Audi RS4 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi RS4 has manual transmission. 2000 Audi RS4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi RS4 | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | RS4 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2669 cc | 2298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 376 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
