2000 Audi RS4 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi RS4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi RS4 would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi RS4 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi RS4 (449 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2000 Audi RS4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi RS4 | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | RS4 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 376 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 449 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2210 mm |