2000 Audi RS4 vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi RS4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi RS4 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (230 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi RS4 (449 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (393 Nm). This means 2000 Audi RS4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi RS4 | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | RS4 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 376 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 449 Nm | 393 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 78 L |