2000 Audi RS4 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi RS4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi RS4 would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi RS4 (376 HP) has 228 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2000 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi RS4 (449 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2000 Audi RS4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi RS4 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | RS4 | Epica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2669 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 376 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 449 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
