2000 Audi S3 vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2000 Audi S3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2000 Audi S3. (210 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi S3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 650 kg more than 2000 Audi S3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi S3 | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | S3 | Brougham |
Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 79 L |