2000 Audi S3 vs. 1995 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2000 Audi S3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Jaguar XJ220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 (968 Nm) has 698 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi S3. (270 Nm). This means 1995 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi S3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi S3 | 1995 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | S3 | XJ220 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 968 Nm |
Top Speed | 238 km/hour | 368 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |