2000 Audi Steppenwolf vs. 1962 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2000 Audi Steppenwolf is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 180 kg more than 2000 Audi Steppenwolf.
Because 2000 Audi Steppenwolf is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Steppenwolf will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi Steppenwolf. (320 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi Steppenwolf.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Steppenwolf | 1962 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | Steppenwolf | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 2135 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
