2000 Audi Steppenwolf vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi Steppenwolf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi Steppenwolf would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (503 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 2000 Audi Steppenwolf. (222 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi Steppenwolf. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi Steppenwolf weights approximately 80 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XF.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (625 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi Steppenwolf. (320 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi Steppenwolf.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Steppenwolf | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | Steppenwolf | XF |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 625 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |