2000 Audi TT vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 480 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | TT | 62 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3210 mm |
