2000 Audi TT vs. 1941 Packard 12
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Packard 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Packard 12 would be higher. At 7,756 cc (12 cylinders), 1941 Packard 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Packard 12 (173 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (170 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Packard 12 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Packard 12 weights approximately 1144 kg more than 2000 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Packard 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Packard 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1941 Packard 12 | |
Make | Audi | Packard |
Model | TT | 12 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 7756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2424 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3440 mm |