2000 Audi TT vs. 1945 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1945 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 385 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 1945 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1945 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | 62 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1945 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5676 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1860 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3280 mm |