2000 Audi TT vs. 1949 Jaguar Mark IV
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 65 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1949 Jaguar Mark IV | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | Mark IV |
Year Released | 2000 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3060 mm |