2000 Audi TT vs. 1949 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1949 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | XK |
Year Released | 2000 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2600 mm |