2000 Audi TT vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 340 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (226 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | TT | FX |
Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 226 Nm | 136 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |