2000 Audi TT vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2000 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | TT | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3690 mm |
