2000 Audi TT vs. 1952 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1952 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2040 mm |