2000 Audi TT vs. 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1955 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | TT | Phantom |
Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3690 mm |