2000 Audi TT vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (170 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Audi | Simca |
Model | TT | Aronde |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 90 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2450 mm |