2000 Audi TT vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,246 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Audi | Studebaker |
Model | TT | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2980 mm |