2000 Audi TT vs. 1962 Austin A 60
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1962 Austin A 60 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | TT | A 60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 122 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2550 mm |