2000 Audi TT vs. 1962 Ford Consul
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Consul would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1962 Ford Consul. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Consul.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Consul. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Consul. (85 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1962 Ford Consul | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | Consul |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 58.2 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2500 mm |
