2000 Audi TT vs. 1962 MG MGB
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 MG MGB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1962 MG MGB. (89 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 MG MGB.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 MG MGB. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 MG MGB. (149 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1962 MG MGB | |
| Make | Audi | MG |
| Model | TT | MGB |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2320 mm |
