2000 Audi TT vs. 1963 Citroen Ami
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1963 Citroen Ami | |
Make | Audi | Citroen |
Model | TT | Ami |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 22 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 42 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 70 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2380 mm |