2000 Audi TT vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 200 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Audi | DKW |
| Model | TT | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 74 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2010 mm |
