2000 Audi TT vs. 1964 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Jaguar MK X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar MK X (361 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 1964 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1964 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | MK X |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 361 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 106 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2900 mm |