2000 Audi TT vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Audi | Reliant |
Model | TT | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 185 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2290 mm |