2000 Audi TT vs. 1964 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,726 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 TVR Griffith (229 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (170 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 TVR Griffith should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 415 kg more than 1964 TVR Griffith.
Because 1964 TVR Griffith is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 TVR Griffith. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1964 TVR Griffith | |
Make | Audi | TVR |
Model | TT | Griffith |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2170 mm |