2000 Audi TT vs. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (217 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 640 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1965 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | Eldorado |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |