2000 Audi TT vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | TT | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 6999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3030 mm |
