2000 Audi TT vs. 1965 Holden FB Special
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden FB Special is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1965 Holden FB Special. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden FB Special.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Holden FB Special. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Holden FB Special. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Holden FB Special.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1965 Holden FB Special | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | TT | FB Special |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2670 mm |
