2000 Audi TT vs. 1966 Citroen DS
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,175 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1966 Citroen DS. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen DS.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen DS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Citroen DS. (164 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Citroen DS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1966 Citroen DS | |
| Make | Audi | Citroen |
| Model | TT | DS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2175 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3130 mm |
