2000 Audi TT vs. 1966 DAF 44
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1966 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF 44.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF 44. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DAF 44. (71 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1966 DAF 44 | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | TT | 44 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 71 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2260 mm |
