2000 Audi TT vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lotus Elan. (147 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | TT | Elan |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1557 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2140 mm |
