2000 Audi TT vs. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 345 kg more than 2000 Audi TT.
Because 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | TT | Starfire |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 6965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3130 mm |