2000 Audi TT vs. 1966 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1966 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1966 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Audi | ZAZ |
Model | TT | 966 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 52 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 54.5 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2170 mm |