2000 Audi TT vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | TT | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 94 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2210 mm |
