2000 Audi TT vs. 1968 MG MGC
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (217 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1968 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 MG MGC.
Because 1968 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (286 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1968 MG MGC | |
Make | Audi | MG |
Model | TT | MGC |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2911 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2560 mm |