2000 Audi TT vs. 1969 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 400 kg more than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (226 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1969 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Colt |
Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 120 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2360 mm |