2000 Audi TT vs. 1969 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1969 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |
