2000 Audi TT vs. 1972 Rover P5B
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1972 Rover P5B. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover P5B.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Rover P5B. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover P5B (295 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 1972 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT. 1972 Rover P5B has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2000 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Rover P5B will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1972 Rover P5B | |
| Make | Audi | Rover |
| Model | TT | P5B |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3528 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 295 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2820 mm |
