2000 Audi TT vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (55 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 127 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |