2000 Audi TT vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | TT | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2480 mm |
