2000 Audi TT vs. 1980 GMC Suburban
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 GMC Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 GMC Suburban would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 GMC Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1980 GMC Suburban. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1980 GMC Suburban.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 GMC Suburban (285 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi TT. (245 Nm). This means 1980 GMC Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi TT. 1980 GMC Suburban has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2000 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 GMC Suburban will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1980 GMC Suburban | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | TT | Suburban |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4092 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3300 mm |