2000 Audi TT vs. 1981 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,969 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 929.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 929. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1981 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 929 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 98 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |