2000 Audi TT vs. 1982 Renault 14
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 14 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1982 Renault 14. (57 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 14.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Renault 14. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 14. (92 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 14.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1982 Renault 14 | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | TT | 14 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1217 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 92 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 69 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2410 mm |