2000 Audi TT vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 670 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (226 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi TT | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | TT | 750 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 55 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2010 mm |