2000 Audi TT vs. 1983 Austin Maestro
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,992 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Austin Maestro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (109 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Austin Maestro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi TT (245 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (178 Nm). This means 2000 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi TT | 1983 Austin Maestro | |
| Make | Audi | Austin |
| Model | TT | Maestro |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 89 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2510 mm |
